Although Beijing is among our favorite cities in China, we were disappointing to hear of the city's alarmingly high air pollution levels- Please note the excerpt below from The New York Times article published January 13, 2013. (Randy Lynch)
By Edward Wong:
Beijing- One Friday more than two years ago, an air-quality monitoring device atop the United States Embassy in Beijing recorded data so horrifying that someone in the embassy called the level of pollution "Crazy Bad" in an infamous Twitter post. That day the Air Quality Index, which uses standards set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, had crept above 500, which was supposed to be the top of the scale.
So what phrase is appropriate to describe Saturday's jaw dropping reading of 755 at 8p.m., when all of Beijing looked like an airport smoker's lounge? Though an embassy spokesman said he did not immediately have comparative data, Beijing residents who follow the Twitter feed said the Saturday numbers appeared to be the highest recorded since the embassy began its monitoring system in 2008.
The embassy's @BeijingAir Twitter feed said the level of toxicity in the air was "Beyond Index," the terminology for levels above 500; the "Crazy Bad" label was used just once, in November 2010, before it was quickly deleted by the embassy from the Twitter feed. According to the Environmental Protection Agency levels between 301 and 500 are "Hazardous," meaning people should avoid all outdoor activity. The World Health Organization has standards that judge a score over 500 to be more than 20 times the level of particulate matter in the air deemed safe.
In online conversations, Beijing residents tried to make sense of the latest readings.
"This is a historic record for Beijing,: Zhao Jing, a prominent Internet commentator who uses the pen name Michael Anti, wrote on twitter "I've closed the doors and windows; the air purifiers are all running automatically at full power."
Other Beijing residents online describe the air as "post apocalyptic," "terrifying," and "beyond belief."
The municipal government reported levels as high as 500 on Saturday evening from some monitoring stations. The Chinese system does not report numbers beyond 500. Nevertheless, readings in central Beijing throughout the day were at the extreme end of what is considered hazardous according to the United States EPA standards. (By comparison the air quality index in New York City using the same standards was 19 at 6a.m. on the same Saturday.)
bis.jpg)
